if yes then give me examples a to why.

And if no?

If a person wants to believe in a god, he will find ways to circumvent any science that obstructs that belief. Some claim that the Christian God placed fossils in the ground to test the faith of Man, making them appear so old that they would suggest the Earth was not created 6000 years ago, as the Bible suggests, but many thousands of millenia before.

It's amazing, the power of faith.

it's impossible to prove that something does not exist
rather the onus should be on the religious to prove that god does exist, seeing as they are the ones who are making giant leaps of faith.

__________________
said thanks for the insults and compliments
you'll never forget my face no more

religion and science should stay separate.

but I must say that the more you know about certain parts of science, the harder it is to believe that there's a "god". I consider myself spiritual in the sense that I think about the universe and everything in it as well as my relationship to those things, but I find it highly implausible that there is a god in the sense that most westerners traditionally think of.

religion and science have to stay separate because science relies on reason, and religion does not.


I think science has come close to disproving that we have souls. You can lesion an area of a person's prefrontal cortex and turn them into a violent sociopath or what some people call a "soul-less" person. Everything we experience is a neurbiological reaction in your head.

If i placed a mild electric shock in your left temporal lobe right now, there is a high liklihood that you would have a "religious experience".
There is also an area of the brain taht when stimulated can evoke out of body experiences.
I'm a neuropsychologist, so i'm biased towards what I have studied and the scientific community