Just rented it yesterday because I thought it would be nice to see some middle-class white people squirm, which is why everyone else rented it, pretty much. And Scarlett.

It was a bit... crap. It was different but too.... meh for my tastes. The first half of the movie just bored the Hell out of me. Scarlett was the only great thing about it, he was okay but fantastic. His second last scene was just bad, at the thing talking with the guys.
All my opinion, of course, my view, but ughhh.

It was good, but not remarkable. Worth a rental, but I'd never ever buy it.

__________________
"Hey Ram, doesn't this cafeteria have a no-fags-allowed rule?"

one of my future ex-husbands stars in that movie.

baby daddy, if he plays his cards right.

__________________
i also like hobos, riding dinosaurs with my best friend jesus and eating glitter.

I have to agree. But i just think its because none of the characters were likeable except Scarletts. Didnt expect the twist at the end though. Actually made me quite angry.

Same. It was like.. okay, this is not only uncalled for but a bit clumsy. And I wanted to see them shot, this isn't exactly the most polite way to die, why not show it? Lack of special effects?

I didn't see a reason for the social commentary either, which I felt was there. And it was just too "let's follow that opening line about luck and shit" for me. Bit boring.

The characters were second-hand crap except for Scarlett. She's the only one who did ACTING acting, especially when she met him outside of that building and caught him lying or when she was talking to him about the baby.

This movie actually kind of sucked. The only thing good about it was Scarllett and I think I'll steer clear of all new Woody Allen movies from now on.

__________________
"Hey Ram, doesn't this cafeteria have a no-fags-allowed rule?"

i dont know why but i really liked it.

perhaps johnathan rhys meyer and scarlett johannsen carried it enough for me to discredit the other actors?

__________________