Uh.. I don't... get it?

did i miss something? was that supposed to be a rape scene? did she go crazy? why did the chick run away with her baby? why didn't they zoom in more on brando's nipples?

I need answers. It was such a HCH movie I almost heaved. but lol@how often she calls brando a greasy common pollock

Bahaha. Heaved. I've done that. Now I will attach the thought of HCH posting to that time in my life.

Anyways, I've never seen this, but I have to say it: Marlon's nipples deserve an Oscar.

Now pass the butter, Robbie, darling.

__________________
"Hey Ram, doesn't this cafeteria have a no-fags-allowed rule?"

hand me the screwdriver kit first

- in the play, yes, there is a rape scene but for the movie version they didn't allow it so you just see the "beginning" of a rape.
- she's been crazy from the beginning.
- again, in the play she stays with stanley. for the movie, she didn't go back coz she got mad at stanley for what he has done to her sister. (sending her to the mental hospital etc.)
- oh how i'd like that...

i LOVE that movie! there's nothing like that stanley kowalski

you'd think a good brando boning might have made the bitch snap out of her delusion.

were they trying to imply that the chick was a hooker, or just liked boning guys while at that hotel?