Welcome to the kittyradio.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Remove these ads when you register. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | 
10-21-2006, 11:43 PM
| | Heartless Challenge | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 147
| | | the film was pretty good i thought.
Meryl Streep was excellent.
I usually don't like Anne Hathaway (she always seems to have the same expression on her face, very annoying) but she was atually ok in this.
this film made me wanna spend, spend, spend. | 
12-15-2006, 09:11 PM
|  | disasterology | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: mittenland
Posts: 1,214
| | | i went into it expecting it to be just like the book which was not the case at all. i'm sure i'll like it on the second run through when i'm not watching it and going, "what the fuck, that didn't happen." | 
12-17-2006, 02:47 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,151
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by make sense i went into it expecting it to be just like the book which was not the case at all. i'm sure i'll like it on the second run through when i'm not watching it and going, "what the fuck, that didn't happen." | I enjoyed it..but i have never read the book..it's funny how books can alter a perception of a movie and very rarely do they exceed expectations! | 
12-17-2006, 07:10 AM
|  | sugar britches | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: here. in my head
Posts: 1,711
| | | i really liked the movie. and i fucking love Meryl. | 
12-17-2006, 04:56 PM
|  | obsidianblackbirdmcnight | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: aotearoa
Posts: 5,305
| | | i haven't read the book, but i did quite enjoy the movie. it wasn't anything earth shattering, but it was definately entertaining/enjoyable.
__________________
MAN FUCKS WOMAN. SUBJECT VERB OBJECT. | 
12-17-2006, 05:52 PM
| | annoying y'all since 1962 | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Sunken City
Posts: 2,563
| | | It was no work of cinematic art or anything, but it was ok for escapism. I was sort of impressed about how they managed to make the guy who plays Vincent Chase on "Entourage" seem so doormatty and average. (Although I've heard that he's gay in real life).
On the whole though, it was a nice movie. Not great, certainly not worthy of a Golden Globe or Academy Award, but nice if you're just needing to veg out. | 
12-17-2006, 11:57 PM
|  | a.k.a Madge Spammer | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Panama
Posts: 8,223
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tracyr It was no work of cinematic art or anything, but it was ok for escapism. I was sort of impressed about how they managed to make the guy who plays Vincent Chase on "Entourage" seem so doormatty and average. (Although I've heard that he's gay in real life).
On the whole though, it was a nice movie. Not great, certainly not worthy of a Golden Globe or Academy Award, but nice if you're just needing to veg out. | I think it totally deserves a comedy golden globe | 
12-18-2006, 01:03 AM
|  | Registered Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 783
| | this movie was kind of stupid like a remake of the movie pretty woman.
a makeover movie. yuck. good escapism
meryl streep was good. i guess the fashion world is interesting but rather watch project runway. | 
12-18-2006, 04:34 AM
|  | glance, don't stare | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: vancouver area rug
Posts: 769
| | | the fashion world is interesting and a lot of work goes into it. it is quite shallow though and a business like any other. it was interesting to show how to appreciate it, but not be consumed by it. | 
03-03-2007, 01:32 PM
|  | i'm so tired | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: my suspicious northwest
Posts: 358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by seethelight i didn't like the casting of anne hathaway. it would have helped if the lead had a semblance to a soul. anne looks so patented america's sweetheart shit. and she's not half as interesting as the others touted as such. wrong choice for a lead.
meryl, though, is brilliant. she's just so cold and bitchy in the role and the moments when the ice melts away don't come off as sentimental bullshit.
overall, the film is just nice, confection but smart. | Exactly! I just finally saw this on DVD, haven't read the book.
I enjoyed the eye candy and the comedy, but the relationships outside of the "Runway" set and Christian were so fake... I don't see why she didn't go with him over the boyfriend. It's as if the movie was saying if you're a "good person" then you must be true to your boyfriend no matter what! That speech where Nate complains that they don't have anything in common anymore... I really didn't see what they had in common to begin with, except each other. And later, when she tells him he was right about everything: he wasn't right, she wasn't turning her back on her friends for "shoes, jackets and belts"... Similarly, her best friend of 16 years had to give a stupid, melodramatic speech to let the audience that their relationship was such b/c we saw NO evidence of it in the movie... and her reason for giving the speech was ridiculous anyway, given that Christian just kissed the side of her face, please...
And I don't know, one thing that annoyed me straightaway was: Would a girl a smart and accomplished as Andy is supposed to be, *really* go to a job interview or her first day at work with her practically-uncombed hair hanging all over her shoulders? She would put it in a ponytail at least. I don't like stuff like that, which serves the movie (making sure she's as daggy as possible before the makeover sequence) but completely disregards common sense or human nature. | 
03-03-2007, 01:36 PM
|  | Woman Talking to Death | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,238
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by perfidia And I don't know, one thing that annoyed me straightaway was: Would a girl a smart and accomplished as Andy is supposed to be, *really* go to a job interview or her first day at work with her practically-uncombed hair hanging all over her shoulders? She would put it in a ponytail at least. I don't like stuff like that, which serves the movie (making sure she's as daggy as possible before the makeover sequence) but completely disregards common sense or human nature. | I read the book and didn't see the movie, but the whole thing disregards common sense. In real life, you would have to kill a dozen people to become Anna Wintour's second assistant, no matter how lousy a boss she is.
__________________ We are sorry, the mind you have reached is not a working mind.
Please hang up and die again.
Please hang up,
And die again. | 
03-03-2007, 01:43 PM
|  | i'm so tired | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: my suspicious northwest
Posts: 358
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Wildwoman I read the book and didn't see the movie, but the whole thing disregards common sense. In real life, you would have to kill a dozen people to become Anna Wintour's second assistant, no matter how lousy a boss she is. | This is true. | 
03-03-2007, 02:50 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,151
| | | i watched it again for the 2nd time the other night and i enjoyed it so much more than the first time i saw it!! | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
Forum Stats:
Members: 14,973
Threads: 43,001
Posts: 1,145,210
Welcome to our newest member, lollygag1234 Latest Threads: |