no, and no.

kiss and makeup!

Ironic how you're the one tell me to fuck off...

I love you brother.

Don't try and make me laugh fagarielina, you know as well as I what kind of spirit he possess'. He's full of bad, negative energy. I just hope for his sake he is able to reconcile with his hideous nature one day, and learn to shed his fear and be a real man full of understanding and love.

Dude there's nothing wrong with mouth to ass.

c'mon..

It's not ironic, it's what your simple mindedness brings forth. From the first day I read your spiel it was evident that the only reasoning you had for being here was to stir up trouble. And no one could give it back. Well now you've met that someone.

You are not a brother to me, a person yes, but that is all. It takes a lot more than what you display to be of a quality person at that.

But my weekend is going to be filled with enjoyment instead of your spoilt agenda.

yaaay mahhhhnnn

hey, throw a few frisbees for me.

haha

Holy fuck. Just reading this thread makes my head hurt... Why is this thread in news and politics because I don't see any news or politics here... Just nonesense.

If your comment is indeed based upon reliable statistics, then no, on it's own this comment would not be considered racist.

As a personal note I would love to know where someone could find these statistics with any degree of reliability

The image of black people eating fried chicken plays to traditional stereotypes. Stereotypes are often based upon general social realities.

Although many racist comments play off of stereotypes, not all stereotypes are inherently racist (read: negative). The italians who eat tomatoes, the romantic frenchman, the personable salesman, the blonde swede-- these are not racist. They are generalized, and as such are probably a bad idea to use, simply because they are not accurate. They are too vague, and to use them regularly would do the subject a disservice.

Really it all comes down to being PC. A speaker's credibility can often be questioned when he or she generalizes unless the situation deems it necessary.

Do you find eating fried chicken offensive? I for one, love it even though it bothers my stomach.

write a paragraph like a grown up, and then i'll read it.

__________________

well anything is based on reality then it just depends on what reality you find yourself.

This thread is a little bit sneaky. There are bound to be people who come in here and cause a fuss, based on the title, without giving the post any real consideration. "Stereotypes are based in reality" would have made for a more accurate title.

Actually, what you've said so far makes sense. However, I'm trying to figure out what point you're leading up to. To say most black people eat fried chicken, if based on statistics, would be fairly acceptable to most people. To apply that to all black people (there must be some black vegetarian/health-conscious people out there) would be to stereotype. Stereotyping can occasionally be offensive but it isn't in that example. A lot of stereotypes are based on a reality of some sort, some really aren't. Some are just fun examples (take, for example, the responses I get when mentioning to people that my bf is Greek: "does he smash plates?") and others are abhorrent ("does he have AIDS*?").

Regardless of a stereotype being based in reality, whether it is acceptable to express and apply that stereotype depends entirely on the nature of the stereotype.


*This was said to me by a British guy. For the record, there is a higher incidence of HIV/AIDS in the UK population than there is in the Greek population. Making that a perfect example of how even the most plausible stereotypes can be wrong. That's why people ought to educate themselves and generally take care with what they say, lest they end up looking foolish.

__________________
Deux hommes font une promenade amicale. L'un des deux porte un parapluie à son bras.
Il se met à pleuvoir. L'homme n'ouvre pas son parapluie et l'autre lui demande pourquoi.
- Parce que ça ne servirait à rien, lui répond son ami. Il est plein de trous.
- Alors, pourquoi l'as-tu pris?
- Parce que je ne pensais pas qu'il pleuvrait.

Most people eat fried chicken in general. Except for non-meat eaters and health-conscious people.
Go to any KFC anywhere. Maybe I just live in an area that has a lot of white people but if I go into a KFC I see lots of white people.

Id say its fair to generalize black people vote a certain way. but I think its less of a strategic thing to those people and more of a vote for a candidate least likely inherting a bloodline of slave owners or Nazi warlords. In that respect I voted for the first time in the same respect.

You might find in a white mans world, without having a certain race of slaves at hand, he will turn most even his own brothers into slaves. So start thanking blacks for becoming more then slaves and second class citizens.

Probably true.
Possibly.
Rednecks.........what?
Good definition. Good going on that section.
No it isn't, not even by your definition.
Well, blacks may vote republican and still belong to 'black culture' but it's generally a solid arguement to say that people have a tendency to vote the way of their culture
Well, offhand I get the sneaky suspicion that this was another attempt at 'winning' a debate by not really having a properly coherent and cogent point that can actually be rebutted.

It also appears to be an attempt at ascribing a trait to liberals, yet doesn;t appear to be clear on what that trait is.

But mostly it's annoying becuase you claim that no one has thus far argued your point , when the poor quality and half-assedness of your OP does not merit any actual substantive response. Unfortunetly for you, you will undoubtedly take this as a sign that your point can't be rebutted and is therefore true, when it's actually an indication that your poor presentation skills have yet again failed to produce a proper posistive arguement.
What fact? Please post again the next time you are sober.
Good for you.

what's your render?

You know, people here would probably be a lot more willing to discuss this with you if you didn't insist that everyone who disagrees with you was somehow deficient. They might take you more seriously and regard you as something more valuable than a hectoring provocateur if you didn't try to pre-empt people's reactions in your opening posts. And they'd certainly be more willing if you didn't phrase it as if you were condoning racism.

If someone who is racist says something else is racist, the fact that they are being hypocritical doesn't excuse either count of racism. They don't "cancel out". That is all.

ah, we have a winner!

hahah.....

"in the heat of the moment....ass to mouth is acceptable"