Originally Posted by AshMcAuliffe
your right... but he's a dope...
anywho i have basically argued that pornography is an external stimuli that has the potential to lead men to rape/murder/torture etc...
i also put that that the sex industry itself promotes inequality of the sexes and that even if there were to be no evidence to suggest that pornography leads to such violent acts against vulnerable groups (ie: children and women) it leads to the 'raping' of womens social and economic statuses.
hmmm. how long is the dissertation? I probably wouldn't have time to read it, but it is kind of hard to evaluate these assertions without understanding where they come from (in any way useful to you).
edit to say: not to be a brat or anything, because I try not to be a grammar nazi on a message board, but is your dissertation already free of grammatical errors? I can't help but notice that "your right" should be "you're right" and if I was going to read 100 pages or so of someone's work, I wouldn't go very far if it had many obvious errors like this and English is the native language of the author.