Welcome to the kittyradio.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Remove these ads when you register. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | |
View Poll Results: Would you donate your body to necrophilia? | |
Yes
|   | 1 | 5.00% | |
No
|   | 9 | 45.00% | |
Only if I knew who I was donating it to.
|   | 10 | 50.00% | 
11-24-2008, 08:44 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | | Would you donate your body to necrophilia? :skull: Since a few little scamps in Wisconsin have been in court lately for "romancing the bones" so to speak, I'm wondering how people would feel about becoming a post-mortem sex slave.
I heard somewhere that you can get a "necro card" which indicates your consent to be sexed up in the event of your death (much like an organ donor card), but I don't know if one has ever been honoured.
So: discusss. 
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 08:46 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | | I'm kind of leaning towards "only if...", because obviously I don't want to be ripped apart by some Fatty Oldsmann and have photographs of my entrails wrapped around his wang all over 4chan. Other than that though, I don't massively care.
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 09:35 AM
|  | Chairman~MouseyTongue | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Chairman Meow
Posts: 7,044
| | No obviously....
But it got me thinking anyway.
Nun Graves.
Especially the old 99 year old Catholic ones that probably died virgins.
Are they still virgins if fucked after they died?
Fucking a dead virgin is something that not every necrophile can say.
I bet if they did it, it would be a dead minor and well....
they maybe necrophiles but I'm sure there's some moral boundry there.
*insert dead baby joke*
or is everything fair game if its dead?  | 
11-24-2008, 09:38 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | | Similarly, roadkill: the ultimate taboo?
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 09:45 AM
|  | Chairman~MouseyTongue | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Chairman Meow
Posts: 7,044
| | Dead animals, I think you're automatically declared "insane" unofficially and have somewhat less accoutability because you're thick and can't help it. i.e. The only reason you'd fuck a dead animal is if you had a screw loose.
Dead minors on the other hand, presumed could have their right mind, just intensely perverse and a tad crazy? Therefore more devious? Just the theory anyway....  | 
11-24-2008, 10:07 AM
|  | Go Go Gran Turismo! | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: LittleBigPlanet
Posts: 5,287
| | | i don't like the idea of someone spunking inside of my deadness
__________________ "Mater Tenebrarum... Mater Lachrymarum... Mater Suspiriorum. But men know us by a single name. A name that strikes fear in their hearts... They call us DEATH!" Mater Tenebrarum, "Inferno" | 
11-24-2008, 10:24 AM
|  | ya basta | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: shallow grave
Posts: 1,719
| | | bored at work oph?
did you remember the character in Ideal who was into that?
__________________ It's a new year, I'm glad to be here. It's a fresh spring, so lets sing.
In 2080 I'll surely be dead. So don't look ahead, never look ahead. | 
11-24-2008, 10:29 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | | Yeah, totes. And sadly I only saw one or two episodes of Ideal. It seemed like it should've been pretty good, but I think I must have had some regular thing that evening and kept missing it.
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 10:35 AM
|  | ya basta | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: shallow grave
Posts: 1,719
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ophiel Yeah, totes. And sadly I only saw one or two episodes of Ideal. It seemed like it should've been pretty good, but I think I must have had some regular thing that evening and kept missing it. |
it wasn't great but they had two whole series on the bbc3 website you could watch before they launched iplayer.
as for necrophelia, i am assuming the act itself is illegal so granting consent wouldn't count for much? or do you just get done for nicking dead bodies and the like?
__________________ It's a new year, I'm glad to be here. It's a fresh spring, so lets sing.
In 2080 I'll surely be dead. So don't look ahead, never look ahead. | 
11-24-2008, 10:36 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | | I guess it depends on the grounds upon which it is illegal. I mean, consent would obviously be a factor, but I don't know whether exhumation or corpse-sex are crimes in and of themselves.
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 10:54 AM
|  | in the end they all tried | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,177
| | | What possible reasons could there be for answering yes? I can't imagine any good coming from it. Unless your dead body were to be used as part of a necrophilia recovery treatment or something. In which case, still no. That's just fucked.
If we're talking in terms of "How much money would you donate your body for?", still no. I don't think there are any conditions under which I would agree to be a necrophilia sex slave.
How do people feel about donating their body for the sole use of their lover? Would the fact that they would have necrophilic tendencies put you off, even if it were for you exclusively? | 
11-24-2008, 10:56 AM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by desdemona What possible reasons could there be for answering yes? | Um, the same reason people say yes to donating organs - because they don't care what happens to their body after they die, would rather see it put to use than interred in the ground for no reason, and want to register their consent before death knowing that it will not be assumed afterwards.
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 11:13 AM
|  | ya basta | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: shallow grave
Posts: 1,719
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by desdemona That's just fucked. | isn't that the point? 
__________________ It's a new year, I'm glad to be here. It's a fresh spring, so lets sing.
In 2080 I'll surely be dead. So don't look ahead, never look ahead. | 
11-24-2008, 11:43 AM
| | BITCH | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 121
| | | im dead u can do whatever the hell u like to me | 
11-24-2008, 11:51 AM
|  | in the end they all tried | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,177
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ophiel Um, the same reason people say yes to donating organs - because they don't care what happens to their body after they die, would rather see it put to use than interred in the ground for no reason, and want to register their consent before death knowing that it will not be assumed afterwards. | There is a big moral difference between saving someone's health and satisfying someone's sexual lust. People who donate their organs can be assured that their donation is in the interest of productivity, whereas nourishing someone's necrophilic tendencies can only be counter-productive, can't it? | 
11-24-2008, 12:34 PM
|  | ya basta | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: shallow grave
Posts: 1,719
| | this is only partially related but here goes... Quote:
'A man caught by police with his penis submerged in a pasta sauce jar was still pleasuring himself while resisting arrest, a court has been told. Police drew their weapons after Keith Roy Weatherley, 46, led them on a brief, slow-speed car chase. Weatherley attracted police attention while he was parked in a no-stopping zone near Nobby's Beach, Newcastle, on October 26, Newcastle Local Court was told yesterday. Police thought he might have a weapon because they saw him doing something with his hands in his lap, the local newspaper Newcastle Herald reported. Instead, they found him partially clothed with his genitals in a jar, a police statement said. That's when the pursuit began, the court was told.
'When Weatherley was stopped, he refused to leave his car and four officers used batons and capsicum spray to get him out. They found a 750mm jar around his penis and said Weatherley attempted to continue "pleasuring himself in between bouts of wrestling". A search of his car uncovered pornography, a homemade sex aid, women's stockings and a Jack Russell terrier. Weatherley pleaded guilty to offensive behaviour, resisting police and disobeying a police direction. He was convicted and fined $600' - Sydney Daily Telegraph.
|
__________________ It's a new year, I'm glad to be here. It's a fresh spring, so lets sing.
In 2080 I'll surely be dead. So don't look ahead, never look ahead. | 
11-24-2008, 01:45 PM
|  | Inventor of the Rapedar | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: nTown, UK
Posts: 5,110
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by desdemona There is a big moral difference between saving someone's health and satisfying someone's sexual lust. People who donate their organs can be assured that their donation is in the interest of productivity, whereas nourishing someone's necrophilic tendencies can only be counter-productive, can't it? | I'm not suggesting that they should be the same card, dude.
And yeah, there's a moral difference. Morally speaking, if we assume that necrophiliac tendencies won't just be suppressed forever, then it's surely preferable for someone who's consented to have their body used post mortem than someone who hasn't.
__________________ <wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau, wee-yo-wee-yo-wee-yoooo-wee-yo-wee-yo-wyau> | 
11-24-2008, 01:52 PM
|  | work that limp | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: saff london
Posts: 1,030
| | | this thread is gonna give me something to think about all evening
__________________ no longer a millionaire | 
11-24-2008, 04:03 PM
|  | < :3 )~~~ | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: COLD CNDN WINTER!
Posts: 5,262
| | | I would be dead so it wouldn't really matter to me. Only being alive at the moment makes me think about what creeps would be crawling on over to my dead body, so I voted, "Only if I knew who I was donating it too."
__________________ Teaching little Johnny to shoot a gun, A terrific way, say father, to get to know your son. | |