Obama or Clinton? - Page 32

ThePrude · #**156** 01-30-2008, 03:48 PM

but then again, the New York Times recently endorsed Hillary Clinton:

Primary Choices: Hillary Clinton

CounterfeitVoid · #**157** 01-31-2008, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mannequin

But I do not think America will elect a black president yet. There are many urban areas that would, and if I could vote I would definitely vote for him, but there is a hell of a lot of small town America, and those small town Americans will never vote for a black man OR a woman, for that matter.

courtesy of Chris Rock...

"..and for those who say America isn't ready for a black president, I say why not? We just had a retarded one"

Everyone should read this article on Hillary
Hillary Clinton's Militarism Exposed

Lemmy Winks · #**158** 01-31-2008, 12:59 PM

CNN or Fox?

11eagle11 · #**159** 01-31-2008, 01:31 PM

RON PAUL

This will be the last election process before it all dissolves to nothingness in the next couple of years...Ron Paul gets in...if not, all hell brakes loose on the streets and on the internet!

We are going to be governing ourselves locally soon in family type communities. Everything that has been hidden from the masses is about to come forth...free energy, covert advanced technology, self-sustaining eco-villages and on and on and on. Those in the military and police of good heart and ethics are going to simply walk away if they cannot ethically correct what is in front of them.

Dirty politicians and everyone else that lies, cheats and steals and murders directly or indirectly in that putrid arena are about to be un-veiled and de-energized.

There is an ethical time upon us like none other....ever! Might as well get Ron Paul in there to start the dismantling and get it done and over with sooner!

fen99us · #**160** 01-31-2008, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CounterfeitVoid

Everyone should read this article on Hillary
Hillary Clinton's Militarism Exposed

Holy crap! I will not vote for her if she wins the nom. My god...

and to those lovely feminists:

Quote:

There is also the fact that after 43 male presidents, the prospect of finally having a woman as chief executive is understandably appealing. Yet, what's the advantage of a female president if her foreign policies are still centered on patriarchal notions of militarism and conquest? What would it mean to the women of Iraq, Iran, Palestine, Lebanon and other countries who would suffer as a result of her policies? Did the position of British women improve as a result of the militaristic policies of their first female prime minister, Margaret Thatcher?