But that's the real problem. That's why when people go on and on about how they agree with everything a certain candidate is saying, and are only going by their words and not anything else, I worry. Because obviously people will say whatever to win. Just like people will sling the mud to win. After all, they can worry about it after they win. The problem is, after they win, if they aren't a person of integrity, they will back out of damn near every fucking position they had on the issues. I never look at the issues only, it's stupid to only trust a person's word in politics.

__________________
"How wrong it is for a woman to expect the man to build the world she wants, rather than to create it herself."

"I postpone death by living, by suffering, by error, by risking, by giving, by losing."

"I will not be just a tourist in the world of images, just watching images passing by which I cannot live in, make love to, possess as permanent sources of joy and ecstasy. "

-from the goddess that is Anaïs Nin

Excellent post ... I'd like to ask these so-called left-leaning voters here why Hillary's deep corporate ties don't bother them. What about Walmart, a retailer underfire for their labor and healthcare polices. She was paid to be on the Walmart board, and paid for every meeting. By 1993 she had accumulated $100,000 in Walmart stock. Yet the policies of Walmart while she was there did not change ...

Her supporters airbrush this out, they got an image of Hillary they follow which isn't reality.

Walmart, under fire for it's labor and healthcare policies. Yet Hillary was on their board for SIX YEARS. When Barack mentioned Walmart in the debates, Hillary made a face, but she don't touch it ... oh no ... the subject is a delicate one indeed ...

-->>

Clinton served on Wal-Mart's board of directors for six years when her husband was governor of Arkansas. And the Rose Law Firm, where she was a partner, handled many of the Arkansas-based company's legal affairs.

Hillary Clinton had kind words for Wal-Mart as recently as 2004, when she told an audience at the convention of the National Retail Federation that her time on the board ''was a great experience in every respect."

But in recent months, as the company has become a target for Democratic activists, she has largely steered clear of any mention of Wal-Mart. And late last year, Clinton's reelection campaign returned a $5,000 contribution from Wal-Mart, citing ''serious differences with current company practices."

Thx .....

Those articles are nearly eight years old. That worldnetdaily one is clearly trying to raise up a storm in an attempt to derail Hillary's first Senate run in 2000. It also seems to have failed. Since those articles were written Hillary not only won her first Senate bid but she also won reelection. I think the only people who are bothered by this are Hillary haters.


What politician doesn't do this?

At election time all politicians become Santa Clause. They promise you all sorts of things. Sometimes they deliver, many times they don't.

So far every criticism of Hillary you're posted is accusing her of being...a politician.

Ron Paul