For excluding Ron Paul from the Fox debates even though Ron Paul polled higher than Guliani.

Here is what Ron Paul has to say about the supporters letting Fox know how much they suck

Ron Paul said that in Pakistan Mushyaff is supported by 8 percent of the people but USA sent them 10 billion in the last 5 years. But it falls on deaf ears. The other candidates will continue to support dictators. Only Ron Paul would stop it.

He's accused of favoring the rich. Yet who has all the drug company lobbyists, and other corporate lobbyists as their advisors, and strategists, and campaign managers? The other candidates. But oh no, they care about the people!! People first! Ya, really!

PS, oh, well, the 'people first' Clintons can always fall back on their $200,000 a shot speeches paid for by Citigroup.

Ha ha.

lol, i like how he says "it looks like they're having some fun" just before they become an angry mob...
bunch of crazies! fox news does suck, though! it's really quite ridiculous and telling that they banned ron paul from their debate, yet he and Giuliani ran about even in new hampshire tonight.

and dollpartz, you do have a point, but obama's got us hoping for change even though it requires a willfull suspension of disbelief. i like his anti-corporate rhetoric, anyhow.

Well, it's a start toward direct action?

I had to laugh a little at the guy who mentioned "could we get arrested?" as well as at the blonde lady who turned around and asked an infuriated crowd to "shut up" as though it would have any effect.

Say what you want about both Obama and Paul, I think they're both amazingly needed in this election to wake a sleeping population. They've both invigorated the young and the apathetic, and my only worry is that after the excitement is over that they return to their previously apathetic state due to a feeling of defeat (the freshly charged, that is). And yes they're quite enthusiastic, to put it lightly, but almost everyone I've seen develop an interest in politics begins as zealous, then calms down a bit and becomes more pragmatic and focused and open. I hope I see that in these supporters in years to come. Maybe this will provoke some to consider a more realistic and beneficial change while still holding true to Ron Paul's honesty? 'Cause that's what's gained him his following above all I think, is his honesty. Hell, I'm generally a socialist, but his honesty sort of renewed a little hope to me, despite my disagreements.

I take a weird position on the election as a whole, though, which is why I suppose I can appreciate Ron Paul so much without agreeing on very many of his platforms.

Yep ... well USA got only a two-party system, so where is the variety gonna come from that means anything? Helps if it happens more within the parties. He represents what Reps used to be.

Uhm I found video of Ron Paul on Meet the Press ... they ask him all the tough questions and he comes out smelling like roses, if somebody wanna get a better feel for what he's about (four parts):

YouTube - Ron Paul on Meet the Press 1
YouTube - Ron Paul on Meet the Press 2
YouTube - Ron Paul on Meet the Press 3
YouTube - Ron Paul on Meet the Press 4

At the end he talks about the drift towards corporate fascism (soft fascism) .. how can he be for the rich only, if he speaks out against corporate fascism?? He is for individual rights, that's what he is for. Does any other candidate talk about this? No! Wonder why. Well just look at where their advisors come from!

He's on record calling Bush Sr 'a bum.'

Reagan was 'a dramatic failure.'

Huckleberry? He quotes Sinclair Lewis ''when fascism comes to this country, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross."

Also he talks about bringing troops home from Korea as well, and Japan, etc. Saving as much as income taxes bring in!

He says they left Vietnam and Vietnam is unified are doing fine, but they stay in Korea, and Korea is a mess.

Have fun