You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Remove these ads when you register. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
and people still claim he has no support which is rubbish. Found these two videos during the day of the massive fund raising called "the tea party" to honor the Boston Tea Party
Ron Paul recently proposed a bill to get rid of taxes on tips (e.g. waitress tips). I am crossing my fingers that it passes--though last time I checked it's being revised by the Ways and Means committee.
I am fearful of tax day this year because every waitress at my place of work last year wound up paying between 500 and 800 dollars back to the IRS on tips they (we) never make--the IRS automatically taxes 12 percent of a waitress's sales regardless of whether or not she made it. And where I used to work, we were lucky if we came home with five dollars. (we did get 5.50 an hour, though, but our sales generally screwed them and quite likely will screw me this April).
Ron Paul even has a web site set up explaining his white supremacist views. It starts out by explaining that the South will rise again to its former glory.
okay but in the article the guy who made the donation acknowledges that he knows ron paul isn't a white nationalist, but that based on other issues, he thought rp was the best person for him to support.
so the white supremacist supports ron paul based on issues not related to white supremacy. why the fuck shouldn't he keep the money? is he supporting the entire belief system of a group by accepting $500 from them? i sure as hell don't think so.
Oh shut up Zoanthropy. Ron Paul does not endorse white supremicists. Should I go running around picking apart all the supporters for other candidates and saying Oh well this other candidate is a crack head and heroin addict.
This other person supports this candidate and snorts cocaine.
This other person is schizophrenic and supports that candidate
Notice how the media has difficulty digging up dirt on Ron Paul so what do they do? They dig up dirt on supporters. How awful. Oh and then they regurgitate the same old crap only to him, "you know you won't win right?"
He's a viable candidate and the media is scared because for once they may not have real control over the masses to tell them who to vote for.
We had the television revolution with JFK, now we have the internet revolution and the media better start realizing that the more they take swipes at them, the more insecure they look and stupid on top of that.
I mean, we have Huckabee being thrown in as the new main endorsement but this crooked religious liar put a rapist back out on the streets because he claimed to have found Jesus only to rape and murder a new victim the next year and on top of that Huckabee has very low views on women.
Ron Paul is a doctor, a gyno and we need someone who can bring a re-birth to America. What better candidate for the job than a doctor?
Just look at him giving life to the constitution.
Roz and other supporters, you rock. Not only are we electing Ron Paul but we are also electing the people.
He is not powered by the media, he is powered by all that want a revolution and like you say Roz, are sick and tired of owing to the IRS and income tax which should have technically been abolished after Germany was rebuilt but people listen to these phase in routines and forget that there was a temporary promise made and it eventually became permanent.
about the white supremacist thing, he endorses a candidate every fucking year. it was bush in 2000--he endorsed him the same way he is endorsing ron paul, but you never heard about it then, and i can guarantee bush never returned the money, either.
the smear campaigns this year are hilarious all round. hilary vs obama, muckabee vs romney, guiliani vs the world, funny how it's THE MEDIA vs ron paul. heh. guess he's not good enough for the actual frontrunners to smear so journalists are doing it for him? maybe this is proof he is now a viable candidate. hah.
i guess it's the media's duty to report these things...i just wonder why they only expose Black's endorsement when it is a viable third party candidate. didn't something similar happen to buchanan last time he ran seriously, years ago? and nader was nearly arrested for trying to attend a debate at which he was even invited?
i don't even agree with 75% of ron paul's beliefs but i feel like i can at least respect him, and i appreciate him for so-called "rocking the boat." which is something i can't say for any of the rest, except perhaps obama, and probably largely only because he doesn't even bother to defend himself to the swine.
i'd love to see obama vs ron paul, though it would bore most americans because it would be the only real, honest debate out there without shit slinging.
Last edited by rozalia qual : 12-20-2007 at 12:45 PM.
Ya they always introduce him or say goodbye with, that's Ron Paul, he's the only decent one, but still low in the polls.
Here's a poll site if you want to follow ... shows different polls for each category. They sure got Paul down near the bottom. Guiliani working the 9-11 fright-o-rama good as ever, and Huckleberry playing the vengeful Jesus endorsed by Chuck Norris ... woo! what's not to like........
Ron Paul supports white power...(KKK) 
Linear Mode
