kittyradio.com



kittyradio.com » real world » news & politics » Anwr


Welcome to the kittyradio.com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Remove these ads when you register. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2006, 06:44 PM
alaska2002 alaska2002 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 302
alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute alaska2002 has a reputation beyond repute
Anwr

The are the same people who want you to trust them with ANWR
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner


Governor keeps lid on gas line contract
By R.A. DILLON
Staff Writer


Wednesday, May 10, 2006 - JUNEAU--The Murkowski administration refused to comply Tuesday with a Juneau Superior Court order to make public the terms of a natural gas contract with the state's largest oil companies.

Judge Larry Weeks agreed with Sen. Hollis French, D-Anchorage, that there was no reason for Gov. Frank Murkowski to keep the contract between the administration and Exxon Mobil, BP and ConocoPhillips confidential.

Weeks ruled that the governor must release any portion of the 300-page contract that the administration and the producers are in agreement on by Tuesday afternoon.

The attorney general's office responded that the contract includes the fiscal terms and other proprietary information of a deal to commercialize the North Slope's 35 trillion cubic feet of known gas reserves with the producers.

Assistant State Attorney General Larry Ostrovsky argued the contract was still being negotiated and therefore the oil companies had not agreed to the terms of the contract.

In his response to the court, Ostrovsky argued that the companies were unwilling to reveal proprietary information in the contract.

"The producers do not consider themselves to have agreed to any individual provisions, and ... reserve the right to go back and renegotiate any particular provision in light of the final negotiation," he wrote in a response to the court.

Calls to spokesmen for BP and ConocoPhillips were not returned Tuesday.

Mark Morones, state Department of Law spokesman, said the administration could not release the contract until it was agreed upon by all parties.

However, the governor has said he will release the contract today regardless of whether the Legislature passes a controversial oil tax rewrite that is supposed to be included in the gas contract.

"The governor is confident he will have an agreement" today, Morones said.

French said he was disappointed by the administration's response and said he looked forward to seeing whether the contract is released on the governor's schedule.

"I'm very disturbed that the governor and the administration are defying a court order," he said. "It certainly calls into question what the governor said back in February."

Murkowski announced in February that he had reached an agreement with ConocoPhillips on the fiscal terms of a deal on gas. Soon after, he announced that Exxon and BP had also agreed to the terms of the contract.

Morones said that was only an agreement in principle and did not rise to the level of an official contract, therefore the contract does not exist until all parties agree on the terms.

French sued last week to see the contract, arguing that he needed to see it to understand how it fit into the oil tax rewrite being considered by the Legislature. "It makes you suspicious of what's happening on the Third Floor to the contract in response to the oil tax rewrite," French said.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.

Forum Stats:

Latest Threads:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0

Site content: Copyright © 2006-2008 kittyradio.com
Any unauthorized usage and/or quotations from this site on other web sites
or in the press are copyright violations and will be pursued as such.
Violators will be prosecuted under United States copyright laws.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157