kittyradio.com



kittyradio.com » real world » news & politics » DC Madam case


Welcome to the kittyradio.com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Remove these ads when you register. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:47 PM
Honey Bee's Avatar
Honey Bee Honey Bee is offline
Santanico Pandemonium
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 3,108
Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute Honey Bee has a reputation beyond repute
DC Madam case

D.C. madam case leads to speculation By MATTHEW BARAKAT, Associated Press Writer
Tue Mar 20, 2:14 PM ET

McLEAN, Va. - High-priced call girls always seem to have their little black books. Deborah Jeane Palfrey, accused of running an illegal escort service in the nation's capital, has 46 pounds of phone records.

And her offer — or threat — to turn them over to the media has some in Washington playing a guessing game as to whether any Beltway movers and shakers are on her list of up to 15,000 client phone numbers.

The 50-year-old alleged D.C. Madam was indicted earlier this month by a federal grand jury on charges of running a high-class call girl ring in the Washington area from her home in Vallejo, Calif. She has denied the escort service engaged in prostitution.

In court records, prosecutors estimate that her business, Pamela Martin and Associates, generated more than $2 million in revenue over 13 years, with more than 130 women employed at various times to serve thousands of clients at $200 to $300 a session.

Her home was raided months ago, but the case attracted little interest until earlier this month, when Palfrey announced that to raise money for her defense, she intended to sell her phone records to any news outlet willing to pay.

In an announcement that was sure to make her clients sweat, Palfrey said outside the federal courthouse last week: "The clientele was upscale and came from the more refined walks of life here in the nation's capital."

Though she said she received multiple bids, Palfrey has since given the list for free to a news organization with a sterling reputation, according to her lawyer, Montgomery Blair Sibley. He has refused to identify the news organization.

Sibley said he hopes the news organization will ultimately help the defense by uncovering the names of customers who can testify that Palfrey's escorts did not engage in prostitution.

Prosecutors say the move to publicize the list is a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate and harass potential witnesses if the government presses ahead with the case. They asked for and received a restraining order from a judge last Friday that bars disclosure of the records.

Sibley said that Palfrey won't be happy about it if any high-profile clients are outed, but she has her back against the wall.

"It's only now, when she has an ankle bracelet on and she doesn't have any alternative, that she contemplated" disclosure of her clients, Sibley said, referring to the conditions imposed on her while she remains free awaiting trial.

With absolutely no hard facts to go on, bloggers and others are enjoying speculating as to whether any bold-faced names are on the client list and whether this will be the East Coast's version of the Heidi Fleiss Hollywood Madam scandal.

But in an online chat with readers last week, Washington Post gossip columnists Roxanne Roberts and Amy Argetsinger said they would be surprised if any big names were implicated.

"We hear `Washington madam' and immediately think, `Her clients are all congressmen and Cabinet secretaries!' But come on, you know it's all going to be a bunch of developers' sons and patent lawyers and CEOs of tech companies you've never heard of," Argetsinger wrote.

So far, Palfrey has not disclosed any of her high-profile clients, but asked to take a deposition from former Clinton White House adviser Dick Morris. In 1996, Morris resigned after a tabloid revealed details of his relationship with a Washington call girl. No proof has been offered that the call girl worked for Palfrey.

Palfrey described her business to reporters outside court as a "legal, high-end erotic fantasy service." In breezy newsletters she sent to her escorts, though, she offered instructions on how to avoid police entrapment.

She also related a story about a newly hired escort who "thought she could go there, collect the $200 and just talk ... her mere presence being justification enough here for the big bucks!!! WRONG!!!"

Palfrey also made it clear that keeping lists of your clients is a big no-no.

"No record is a good record!!! Therefore, all information regarding a client/appointment is to be destroyed (burned, shredded) within four hours," she wrote in a 2000 newsletter.

In another newsletter, she berated an unidentified escort for getting caught by police in Alexandria with a client list. "The bimbo kept records (apparently)," Palfrey wrote, according to court records.

___

Associated Press writers Kim Curtis in San Francisco and Allison Hoffman in San Diego contributed to this report.

On the Net:

Deborah Jeane Palfrey Legal Defense Fund

U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia: United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia

D.C. madam case leads to speculation - Yahoo! News
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neko Case historygravity the jukebox 1 02-27-2007 07:04 PM
The Shawn Hornbeck case (kidnap victim) Grace&Constanza news & politics 29 01-26-2007 03:36 AM
case studies orchestral the written word 17 12-06-2006 09:03 PM
Dear Sir/ Madam lyrical the void 7 10-13-2006 06:19 AM
Costner Named in Hotel Sex Act Case it. on screen 9 04-26-2006 12:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.

Forum Stats:

Latest Threads:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0

Site content: Copyright © 2006-2008 kittyradio.com
Any unauthorized usage and/or quotations from this site on other web sites
or in the press are copyright violations and will be pursued as such.
Violators will be prosecuted under United States copyright laws.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156