who really even cares anymore?

altho that was definately very well written
give yourself a pat on the back


so anywaaaaaay
whats youre (selfish?) motivation for this?

referring to--
Even the altruism exhibited by species on the individual level is the work of selfish genes seeking propagation. --ofcourse


maybe its time to mutate?

but thatd be "natural" as well given that its possible and has/ishappeneding
of course thatd be taking for granted that THEY are human beings

its kidnainteresting i was wrking on a sawng about this espousal of -onthe flipside _as you wrote the"liberal "viewpoint" if you can call it that even
i dont like them either
but i seem to hear that humans are basicallyassholes (forlackofabettaword)"NATURALLY"alot more than whatyoure saying
so dont worry alot more people are onyour "side than you think

so anyway i was talkin to mahselfon datoliet
DAS HOW I DU
about this basically
and as i saidbefore the burden of proof lies on yousies
but the evidence has been tampered with? so good luck
i still cant word it correctly tho i jsut kindaleft it as is there is somekinda" filler in therei admit
but im sureitll work itself out in time

law is a numb notion

Probably Claud Lévi-Strauss. He's a bit of a genius. However, the norms he describes don't really cover sexuality. He just observes that there are commonalities between human societies' various myths. Psychologically, some things are considered universal symbols. But these come about from having a "normal" upbringing, a "normal" attitude toward sex, food, etc. That doesn't necessarily mean much.

can you post your picture?thanks