sorry for the confusion but even so - why use this type of arguing? You're likely intelligent. You have good taste, you read this board. What sense do insults serve other to make oneself feel superior and another inferior? Why invest energy into putting someone else down when you can use that energy for yourself. I'm not trying to enforce my morals on you or say that lets all join hands and sing kumbaya, I find that nauseating! I just think people should put aside their 'issues' in a discussion and take it completely to the intellectual arena, where it makes no sense to insult. I think that people get to truth this way. If you can detach yourself somewhat, feelings are less likely to get hurt. People always hate the mediator because conflict is more fun but it doesn't solve anything.

Jesus, this is like some caricature. Once again the blinkered dogmatist tells me I need to be more skeptical

I don't remember you saying that you were 'above reflexive repping' either, although I do abuse a lot of substances, so my memory is not a great indication of what you did or didnt say. However, unless all that cum of your brothers that you swallow every night when youve finished stuffing your fat ass with saturated fatz has finally seeped its way into the neuron fibres of your brain and so fully bunged yr synapses to the extent that you’ve developed a catastrophic aphasia, surely you remember yr many "whinings" about how I was 'only repping you cause you repped me blab la bla'. Now that you’re clearly doing the same thing it would be remiss of me not to point out your hypocrisy wouldn’t it? No biggy. And like I ever paid you enough attention to discern what I think about you halfwit. lofl lofl lofl

Pass off some of its tenets as fact? omfg! Maybe some 'tenets of sociobiology' are facts? Actually, they inform current orthodox views of cognitive science! Well...not that orthodoxy means anything, as clearly the moral norms that allow idiots like you to breath oxygen dont bode well for the merit of popular opinion, but since you pretend you know shit.

Psychology is crap. Unfortunately with this attitude you'll never develop into a proporly functioning human being. Given your pedestrian understanding of scientific trends and philosophy, I don't think I want to torture myself to a hearing of you criterion of a ‘pure’ science. I tend to agree with Popper and Kuhn and Quine that the idea of a ‘pure science’ is pure nonsense. But hey, im not a semantic chauvinist, there are many other views. – ‘Scientific realism’, ‘instrumentalism’, ‘conformation holism’, ‘enumerative induction” blab blab la. It’s actually an unresolved ongoing epistemic problem, one of the biggest ones, so your dogmatic devotion to your subjective p.o.w. betrays mammothgignorance and not to mention the obvious irony.

Personally I subscribe to the Popperian Arian/Quinarian idea that falsifiability is the best test of a science. Gene-mapping, made possible by MRI –ing brains has vindicated a LOT of EP theory. As much as it can be. Yes, please, debate me on this one.


Length? There is no length issue here, except perhaps the vastness of your stupidity. Turn your head sideways and drain the cum out yr ears for the benefit of your comprehension. Its not the quantity of what was written, it was the content of what was written. Your rep was an attempt to shore up credibility by saying youve studied something in a lab, mine was a kindly stfu with the sermonizing on issues that all free thinking individuals should remain agnostic on. See the difference?

There really is nothing for the bioanthropologists and geneticists to disagree with re. me, because ive made no claims, my position is one of agnosticism and flexibility. and that’s all. Im merely the promethius sent by Zeus to show you your zealotry and determinism is unjustified.

The irony here is approaching the level of comedy.

xxxx.

I really like you and your cultural philosophy, I think most of it is spot on. IS it influenced by Hegel and Nietzsche at all? or just all your own? Because you strike of them.

PS, my insults are an epiphenomenon to my logic, the ‘froth on the wave’, tropes with which I decorate my language. For my own amusement.

im merely the promethius sent by Zeus to show you your zealotry and determinism is unjustified.

nigga i neva u sent u nowhere
cept to da kitchen to bake me a pie

Ha. I'm no fan of traditional psychology, but the word "projection" definitely springs to mind here.
It's really funny that you said this, because it is exactly what I think about you, hence why I don't try to get into conversations with you. You are never interested in honest debate, you're only interested in throwing around names & references. ffs, I don't even think corky drops names as frequently as you do.


I don't care how smart you think you are, posts like this reveal your true mentality. this is pure tard warz shite & I'm not at all interested.

w/e I don't care. Like I said, your observations about me are about as meaningful as osho's. But if you really want to know, there have been many times I've thought about neg repping you because you're an arrogant bastard who pretty much constantly says stupid, pretentious, meaningless shit. I just refrain because interacting with you is such a huge waste of time. So consider that the one neg rep to make up for the many I would have sent if I were not deliberately avoiding you. Since you started the interaction, there was no good reason for me to continue avoiding you, though if I'd known you were going to cry about in a forum, I might have refrained.

maybe they are, but that doesn't mean I don't get to call you on the ones that aren't, particularly when you're trying to pass them off as fact and not speculation.

lolz. you know, not that I care what you think, but if anyone else is reading this, I really should clarify that I don't think all of psychology is crap.


again, lolz. just lolz. I'm glad you don't want to hear it because I'm not particularly interested in conversing with you. If you could just ignore me that'd be great. I don't know why you even stoop to read my posts since I'm clearly the most ignorant person on the board.


This is a perfect example of why I consider you pretentious. Did you know you can say what you think without dropping 3 names?


oh burn. you're right, I'm stupid and I let guys jack off in my ear. I take back what I said before, debates and conversations with you are so stimulating and worthwhile.

yes I do see the difference but the fact remains that you're a whiner and I have studied these things in the lab and with statistics. Personally I think your constant namedropping is nothing less than an attempt shore up credibility.

oh wow, you think you're some kind of messenger of god, why am I not surprised?
look, you can pretend that you've made no claims but by saying that what I said was stupid, you are saying that what biological anthropologists have said is stupid. You're not exactly neutral on the topic.