Full article can be seen here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/books/03OJ.html

Simpson Transcript Describes Murder

In November O. J. Simpson sat for what would have been one of the most unusual interviews in television history — a hypothetical recounting of how, if he had been the killer, he might have murdered his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald L. Goldman more than a decade ago.
The interview, taped in Miami to publicize a book, “If I Did It,” was never broadcast, as public outrage exploded over the idea that Mr. Simpson might profit from the murders that many people believe he committed, despite his acquittal in a criminal trial.
But a partial transcript of the interview Mr. Simpson had with Judith Regan, the publisher of the proposed book, makes vividly clear the disquieting nature of the entire exercise.
At one point during the interview, Mr. Simpson says: “As things got heated, I just remember Nicole fell and hurt herself. And this guy kind of got into a karate thing.” It was then, he says, that “I remember I grabbed the knife.” Later, asked about whether he had taken off a glove before handling the knife, Mr. Simpson says, “You know, I had no conscious memory of doing that, but obviously I must have because they found a glove there.”
According to the transcript, that moment is one of several during the interview in which Mr. Simpson, while maintaining that he is merely recounting a hypothetical narrative, says rather oddly that he cannot remember certain details.
The partial transcript of the interview — six pages transcribed from what were said to be nearly four hours of tape — was given to The New York Times by a person who had been involved in the aborted televised production.


It goes on to say he is trying to regain the rights to the story, as he is considering doing another book.

Maybe his next book should be titled "How To Get Away With Murder"

If you go on to read the rest of the article, it claims he had an accomplice. If that's to be believed, perhaps OJ could learn a thing or two about keeping his mouth shut from him. (I personally think it's a bunch of nonsense.)

What does he think he has to gain from this? Does he just have some pathological need to confess? Is the guilt killing him? If so, I wish it would work a little faster. He absolutely sickens me.

This is all sooooo last century.....

You're certainly under no obligation to read it. I thought some people might find it interesting.

What's your problem, anyway? Did you attend sensitivity training classes with the Juice?

Sorry for living. Hasn't this been done to death or have you been living under a rock for the last decade? additionally, are you a fag or hag?

If its true he had an accomplice it would be interesting to know who it was.

Al Cowlings maybe??

He claims it was a man named "charlie", whom he had recently befriended.

O.J killed kurt cobain aswell

lol, there really is no justice in the world.

He makes no sense at all. He first says that it's a hypothetical account but then he says the reason why they found a glove at Bundy is because he took off the glove when "Charlie" handed him the knife. Where is the hypothetical aspect of it????

What a bunch of bullshit.

He premeditately murdered Nicole Brown adn Ron Goldman and everyone knew that, even since before the trial. His lawyers knew it, everyone knew it. Even the jury knew he was guilty, but they were too afraid to put this celebrity mogul behind bars.

The only reason he is free is because he is a celebrity, and that's the only reason why Johny Cochran and the "dream team" deffended him, because if he had been a common nodody john doe, no lawyer would've defend him and would've made him plead guilty because the physical evidence was so overwhelming.

Ironically a family of good hard working people like the McMartins goes to prison accused of child molestations that never took place and get their lives ruined and this murderer walks free.

creepy.
in the very least can we lock him up and throw away for the key for crimes against good taste?

__________________

it must be frusterating watching him carry on the way he does getting away with the murder and making money off it. and he knows how far he can go. he is a dick.

I really really recommed Marcia Clark's Without a Doubt. Some people accuse her of not being objective but she talks a whole lot deal about the physical evidence and she even acknowledges lots of the mistakes she made, I thought it was very objective.

The thing is that that book is a great window into human stupidity. Our sick values. Our fear. How we simply didn't want to believe, in spite of all the evidence in the world, that this man murdered and abused this woman. People demonized everyone from Denise Brown to Dennis Fung and most notably Mark Furhman, just to get away from the fact that O.J is a murderer. I mean people didn't want to see it. It started as a murder trial and ended up being the Mark Fuhrman trial over the use of the word "nigger".

Marcia Clark mentions a GENIUS cartoon that was published during the trial, and it was a little kid watching the OJ trial on tv asking his mom, "mom, what is the forbidden N word?? and she goes like "Nicole".

I mean it was genius. The trial was about EVERYTHING except that poor woman's suffering. It's appalling.

I feel so stupid... During the OJ I was bragging how innocent OJ is...

When OJ wrote that book of HOw he would have Killed his wife that is when I realized OJ is guilty as sin.. I feel like a fool for bragging about how innocent OJ is..

OJ shows no respect towards his dead wife. A real man that loves his wife for real would never say or write about killing his wife..

OJ needs to go to jail and turn himself in.

This is not a black and white issue it’s about right and wrong and what OJ did is 100% wrong. I apologize to Nicole’s family and any others who I offended because on yahoo discuss I wrote that Nicole’s family and friends was racist and they are not they just simply wanted justice for their precious sister, daughter, friend.

When the news reported that OJ was writing that book about how he would have killed Nicole it hit me like a ton of bricks because of what I was bragging to my co workers, friends, family and Yahoo discuss...

what about the edivence¿? that never convinced you?

At the time the evidence did convince me that OJ was innocent but I kinda had doubts so I gave OJ the benefit of the doubt in my mind..

But as soon as I heard on the news about OJ's new book about "how he would have killed his wife" I immediately thought about all my bragging about How innocent OJ is... I really do honest to God feel like a fool..

OJ is guilty and he managed to fool the Justice system...

OMG THE EVIDENCE CONVINCED YOU HE WAS INNOCENT???? WHAT THE FUCK??

Did she mention her screw up regarding the jury selection? I read jury experts told her not to select black women for the jury because in interviews they found black women had a negative opinion of Clark. She disagreed and thought she could get a conviction with a jury of black women. I think after trial interviews showed black female jurors really, truly, didn't like Marcia Clark.

that is utterly and absolutely not true. She mentions the fact that she was unpopular with the majority of black women, and they tried not to get a mostly female jury but the defense played it so dirty that there wasn't much they could do about it.

You must remember that Judge Ito was 50,000% pro defense and he gave Marcia and her team a tough deal and constantly gave advantage to the defense, they couldn't do much about it.

In fact she was totally skeptical about getting a conviction when she saw the type of jury they got.