Kittyradio Forums
Go Back   Kittyradio Forums > creativity > makeup, hair, & perfume


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 11-23-2006, 05:27 AM
oasis's Avatar
The Queen Of All Ive Seen
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,083
oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute oasis has a reputation beyond repute
nivea doesnt test on animals!

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-24-2006, 05:15 AM
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 606
Judeeboobs has disabled reputation
Was just going by BUAV info, maybe it's out of date? Not to worry..
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-17-2007, 02:29 PM
Black Mambo's Avatar
cuntybaws
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,487
Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute Black Mambo has a reputation beyond repute
One thing that has always bothered me about even trying to stick to animal-friendly products was the idea that the individual ingredients of a product are likely to have been tested on animals even if the final product isn't. I see a couple of people have mentioned this fixed cut-off date concept, and I saw a list someone posted up there that had some companies on it. Is there a handy list online of all the major cosmetic companies and whether they test products and/or use a cut-off date for their ingredients? I would find this incredibly helpful.

Yay for Clinique and Estee Lauder. Not so yay for L'Oreal (already knew about them) and Rimmel. I'm going to have to do some renewing of my make-up/toiletries collection - this is as good an excuse as there ever will be, haha.

God, I love The Body Shop. I'm not terribly bothered by L'Oreal's acquisition of the company, provided TBS stick to their principles. Aside from the quality of their products, I'm convinced much of their popularity also comes down to the animal-friendly aspect. What you've got to remember is that mergers and acquisitions like this really just boil down to finances, shareholders' returns, profits, etc. Maybe it's not great that TBS would associate with a company that does do testing on animals, but the association is pure business, that's the way I look at it. As long as L'Oreal aren't meddling and forcing TBS to change their practices, I don't see a problem in continuing to enjoy TBS's products as normal.


Oh and a random non-animal-testing point worth noting for the socially-conscious: If any of you are amongst those who boycott all Nestle products, let it be known that Nestle own over a quarter of the shareholding and voting rights in the L'Oreal group. Take from that what you will. It's a bit tenuous, but it might bother some people.

(edit: sorry about bumpage of an old thread, btw, saw it as a related thread)

Last edited by Black Mambo; 06-17-2007 at 02:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-18-2007, 02:05 PM
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
hakakahn is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Mambo View Post
One thing that has always bothered me about even trying to stick to animal-friendly products was the idea that the individual ingredients of a product are likely to have been tested on animals even if the final product isn't. I see a couple of people have mentioned this fixed cut-off date concept, and I saw a list someone posted up there that had some companies on it. Is there a handy list online of all the major cosmetic companies and whether they test products and/or use a cut-off date for their ingredients? I would find this incredibly helpful.
The Buav approved companies list is a list of products that are not tested and/or apply the fixed cut off rule.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-18-2007, 05:00 PM
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 82
arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts arenarockgoddess is infamous around these parts
sugar

sugar cosmetics sold at sephora and ulta are tested on girls not animals
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
animals , are or are , beauty , list , products , tested

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Forum Stats
Members: 16,668
Threads: 48,554
Posts: 1,285,389
Total Online: 56

Newest Member: kalijade

Follow Kittyradio

Latest Threads



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:12 AM.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

Site content: Copyright © 2006-2008 kittyradio.com
Any unauthorized usage and/or quotations from this site on other web sites
or in the press are copyright violations and will be pursued as such.
Violators will be prosecuted under United States copyright laws.