I didn't like any of her songs, and I don't think any one was resposible but her.

I like kelly but lol at her for whining

Not everyone's lucky enough to have a millionaire for a dad. She should count her blessings.

Okay, she's not full on blaming her dad. Misleading title, very opinionated, not just news anymore. It's an opinion piece now, ugh.

Opinion pieces belong to Pitchfork and NME. Clear examples of critics gone wrong.

And, yeah, I doubt that she would be as popular as she is without her family title anyways. I don't mind her nearly as much as some twats though. She should be happy with HAVING a fucking album out and stop worrying about what the celebutantes are going to throw at her, insult-wise, at the next Hollywood whatnot.

__________________
"Hey Ram, doesn't this cafeteria have a no-fags-allowed rule?"

In a way she has a point, but she wouldn't have an album without her parent's connections, so it was still a cuntish thing for her to say.

She isn't all that talented and way too ugly to get by on her looks like so many of today's pop stars. If she was a nobody, there's no way her "talent" would get her noticed.

And it's not as though she wrote the songs herself. She was working with professionals that the average wannabe pop-star would not have access too.

Her advantages far outweighed her one (arguable) disadvantage, so she should make a like a good little failed popster and fuck off.

Another thing, I get tired of all these performers and their tired excuses for why they fail.

Maybe it's just that the songs weren't good enough and people responded accordingly for a change.

People seem to think that because Fergie and Jessica Simpson can score hits with shit music, everybody is entitled to.

I bet if Kelly had one really amazing song, it would have caught on regardless of anything else.

Liz Phair fans do the same thing. "Boo-hoo, her third-rate Sheryl Crow imitations could have done better if the record company only worked harder at ramming them down the throat of an uninterested public."