Just a thought I had. I mean, in chart/sales terms albums live and die on the "swinging voters", not the die-hards, and there would have been more goodwill toward "Hole" than "
Courtney Love" from randoms. Their previous album had gone Top 10. I always thought AS sort of came across, even in reviews, as being perceived a bit of a "
Courtney freaks only" purchase. Hole's previous album was more "latest release from a fairly big act".
I know if she had kept the Hole name and operated the band like a franchise with studio gimps in the other roles it'd be "a bit Simply Red" - or worse, "a bit Guns'n'Roses" - but I wonder if people would have been better disposed towards the record? Was Hole a brand worth knocking on the head, even if it was without Eric?
Meh. Musings.